And sniper or long range emetic gun or crossbow.
There are still lots of items that can be added in this game but i have a feeling, they took all the ideas and will throw them into 007 to make it have its own unique items compared to hitman.
And sniper or long range emetic gun or crossbow.
There are still lots of items that can be added in this game but i have a feeling, they took all the ideas and will throw them into 007 to make it have its own unique items compared to hitman.
I think that would require more work than ioi is willing to put in, for this game, at this point in its cycle. Which is understandable honestly. It just sucks because there"s a lot of good ideas!
I still kinda want a Silenced Striker. It would be genuinely funny to use.
A remote sedative duck could maybe be neat (with a reskin included for double ducks). I thought pressing a button and having targetās personal guards drop to the ground as you move in for the kill might look cool. Perhaps give it a quack that lures NPCs in the room on detonation for balance + potential distraction shenanigans.
With how many easy SA knockout tools this game already has (banana, dart guns, snailbomb, the upcoming egg, chewing gum, antique sedative syriā¦nvm) it hopefully wonāt be that busted.
The one thing that I donāt like about the blue egg being added as an unlock - weāre never going to get the full egg set as unlocks for obvious reasons (looking at you red egg) so its always going to be incomplete. And that is going to be something that bugs forever, even though its completely understandable why.
Damn my obsessive need for things to be in complete sets!
I just want the regular egg from that mission. Would be pretty nice to have a stone-like object to deck people with.
This is very possibly the worst and most dismissive post youāve made on HMF, and youāve got a fair few others to choose from.
Considering the context, I donāt think it is dismissive. Let me be clear, Iām not saying Heisey has bad opinions overall (in fact, one of the things we seem to agree on is the state of Elusive Targets, and I donāt think Iāve seen them speechless before). But when it comes to any kind of balance discussion, they go for the one angle that is heavily subjective to onesā experience, instead of the more rational logic other people use which is more befitting of the conversation. Thatās probably why weāre so much like Oil and Water. Now, āFun factorā has a place in balance discussion, do not misunderstand. But what is fun for everyone and what is fun for one specific subset of people tend to clash on a game-wide scale.
Iām usually not that dismissive of opinions, am I? I do try to see things from both sides, even if I disagree with it, so Iām a little unsure where youāre getting that from? Maybe because you disagree with my opinions more frequently? Maybe I really am too blinded by rage to notice. But on the whole, I donāt think thatās true. My goal is to aim for constructive, not destructive conversation. Unfortunately, it tends to break down into the latter if one side is not willing to even entertain the opposing sideās perspective.
And then that lead to the Breakdown: 2024 edition. Coming to Netflix soon!
I hope I speak for everyone when I say that I am tired of this going nowhere fast. It just leaves me angry and unhappy. I am sorry for the arguing, anyone else affected has probably every right to be annoyed at our bickering.
Wee reminder that even though itās not on the roadmap, The Broker Elusive Target has just gone live for the next 10 days, in Paris.
I canāt find the exact wording in your post because itās currently flagged (along with Heisenbergās) but the thrust of what riled me and caused my reply above was the accusation that people who agree with Heisenberg in this particular debate (Iām one of them) werenāt listening to what you were saying, rather than both listening to you and still disagreeing with you. I tried to offer an olive branch saying exactly that, and was unimpressed that your post above suggested otherwise.
Itās in that weird period between when the previous roadmapās content ends and the current roadmapās content begins.
So is the micro taser. Iād imagine a proximity taser duck to work just like that? And I donāt see too much of a difference between placing a duck in a puddle and placing a micro taser and a coin (to get someone, ideally the target, to walk into that trap) in a puddle.
What did he say ? Its deleted.
Is maintenance enough ?
The rubber duck and undying suit litteraly arent in the game files.
Up until now , everything was in the files before the maintenance started.
i canāt say anything about that because iāve never had something that topped off that in the hitman community
With the micro taser you have to give up two inventory slots to bring both the taser and coins in, or scour the level to find the latter, rewarding level knowledge. I actually did mention yesterday that I donāt think that the remote taser is balanced either (it being non-suspicious is probably worse tbh), but at the very least the plan is a bit more complex to pull off, even if the complexity boils down to taking two items instead of one.
I grant you, itās not much of a difference, but itās there.
Sure, but coins are a dime a dozen on almost all maps, so even if someone really doesnāt know the map very well, theyād find them sooner or later.
And we really are in endgame territory here. The maps are all between eight and almost four years old, I donāt think āpeople who have played the games for more than three weeks should have an advantageā is actually relevant when considering which items to add? They already have an advantage because they know what theyāre doing, and know how to not fuck things up, if only theoretically.
If you watch actual newbies play, youāre more likely to see people shoot everyone and try to run, instead of building more or less āelaborateā traps.
I donāt think a taser duck would help them too much.
I see what you did there!
I couldnāt resist, but at the same time, I cringed. Two sides of the same coin with this one.