It’s not a literal comparison. But I shouldn’t expect you to understand the concept of figurative language.
I don’t. Neither does @Silvereyes or @BlobSponge. The three of us have all upvoted New York today. But that only gives us a combined +3 points.
Now, let’s examine today’s downvotes.
@magicdave94 & @MrOchoa both gave New York -2. So, I guess you could say they consider New York inferior to the older levels. Fair enough.
@Danger_dog_guy_7 gave -1 each to Lee Hong and New York, so that’s considering them equal.
Then there’s you and @thefixer47. Each of you are WoA-only players, following your own set of rules to vote only on WoA maps. Therefore your votes do not represent any value judgement about New York in comparison with older levels.
So, of everyone voting so far today, 3 people support New York, whilst only 2 people can be said to “consider it inferior” to older maps. There’s clearly no consensus view about New York. If anything, consensus is erring on the side of supporting New York at present, with 3 people endorsing it.
But New York has received -9 in downvotes today. To be clear, It’s getting -4 votes per day from people who have never played any of the older games.
@hitman_fan - your downvotes are working to ensure New York loses out to older levels, even though you’re not capable of making an informed decision about their relative value yourself. I reiterate what I have said before: IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO “ABSTAIN” FROM VOTING ON THE OLDER LEVELS.
By continuing to vote, you are making an active choice - whether you like it or not - to save an older level and relegate a WoA map in its place. YOU ARE CAUSING THIS TO HAPPEN. YOU ARE IMPACTING THE GAME. YOU ARE - UNWITTINGLY - VOTING TO SAVE AN OLDER MAP.
Your participation continues to tarnish this contest.