Ask HMF anything

[CamTheChest]

I’ll be bumping my question once more here, seems a few posts before that were either deleted or flagged. Not sure where exactly this should go but ah well.

@CamTheChest

I remember a few years ago Hitman 2 had their last roadmap, and people were quick to viscously compare it to being buggy, little to no ETs, and by far the worst game people had experienced. Now, we’re at the point where they yearn for the previous game all because someone didn’t like paying extra for stuff.

I’m not saying Hitman 2 is more justified than Hitman 3, I’m not even saying it’s justifiable; but why is it when people want to settle for something “better”, that “better” was actually opposably worse?

So from what I’ve observed, the same people who they preferred Hitman 2 over Hitman 3 for having paid DLC now, were also the ones who preferred Hitman 1 over Hitman 2 for being buggy years ago. Am I seeing this right?